Camacho v. State of Kansas et al
Plaintiff: Mario L. Camacho
Defendant: State of Kansas, Kansas Department of Corrections, Russell W. Hasenbank, Koleen Nosekabel, Lynn Koehn and Clint Petterson
Case Number: 5:2021cv03220
Filed: September 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Crow
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2021 Filing 6 RESPONSE (titled Motion for Relief from Judgment) by Plaintiff Mario L. Camacho re #5 Order. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ENTERED: The court shall direct plaintiff to show cause by November 18, 2021 why his complaint in Case No. 21-3220 should not be treated as a motion for relief from judgment in Case No. 14-3087 and denied and dismissed for failure to supply good grounds for relief. If plaintiff argues that Case No. 21-3220 should be treated as a new case instead of a motion for relief from judgment, then plaintiff must show cause why the case should not be dismissed as untimely filed. If the court does treat the complaint as a motion for relief from judgment in Case No. 14-3087, then the court shall direct the Clerk to refund plaintiff's partial filing fee to the address plaintiff has left with the court. Plaintiff's listed address in Case No. 14-3087 should be changed to the address listed in Case No. 21-3220. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/20/2021. Mailed to pro se party Mario L. Camacho by regular mail. (jal)
October 14, 2021 INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE PAID on 10/14/2021. Receipt number T4631015143, in the amount of $ 11.50. (mls)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $11.50, calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted to and including October 14, 2021, to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 09/30/21. Mailed to pro se party Mario L. Camacho by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
September 30, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Mario L. Camacho. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement, #2 Letter to Clerk, #3 Envelope) (smnd)
September 10, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Response deadline 10/12/2021. Mailed to pro se party Mario L. Camacho by regular mail. (jal)
September 10, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Mario L. Camacho. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (jal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Camacho v. State of Kansas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mario L. Camacho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Kansas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kansas Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Russell W. Hasenbank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Koleen Nosekabel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lynn Koehn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clint Petterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?