Gilbert v. Simmons
| Craig Ivan Gilbert |
| Charles Simmons |
| 5:2022cv03215 |
| September 27, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Lungstrum |
| James P O'Hara |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER of 10CCA: On or before November 21, 2022, Appellant must show cause in writing why he should not be required to prepay the entire filing fee as required by 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Any response Appellant files must be unique to this appeal and must not be combined or included with a response to be filed in another appeal. Cross referencing is similarly disallowed. Failure to timely respond to this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 42.1. (Appeal No. 22-3224) (smnd)
|
| Filing 8 APPEAL DOCKETED in 10CCA on October 25, 2022, and assigned Appeal No. 22-3224 re #6 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment filed by Craig Ivan Gilbert. (smnd) |
| Filing 7 PRELIMINARY RECORD ON APPEAL transmitted to 10CCA re #6 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: #1 Preliminary Packet) (smnd) |
| APPEAL FEE STATUS: filing fee not paid re: Notice of Appeal #6 on behalf of Plaintiff Craig Ivan Gilbert. (THIS IS A TEXT ONLY ENTRY-NO DOCUMENT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION.) (smnd) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Order on Motion for Reconsideration by Plaintiff Craig Ivan Gilbert. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER ENTERED: The Motion to Reconsider Appointment of Special Prosecutor (Doc. #4 ) filed by Craig Ivan Gilbert is denied. This case remains closed. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 10/13/22. Mailed to pro se party Craig Ivan Gilbert by regular mail. (smnd)
|
| MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #4 MOTION for Reconsideration. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(ss) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Reconsideration by Plaintiff Craig Ivan Gilbert (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 3 JUDGMENT regarding Memorandum and Order #2 dismissing matter. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 09/29/22. Mailed to pro se party Craig Ivan Gilbert by regular mail. (smnd) |
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This matter is dismissed. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 09/29/22. Mailed to pro se party Craig Ivan Gilbert by regular mail. (smnd)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Kansas Court of Appeals, Case Number 2003-, filed by Craig Ivan Gilbert. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gilbert v. Simmons | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Craig Ivan Gilbert | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Charles Simmons | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
