Osterman v. Hartzell et al
Plaintiff: Scott Osterman
Defendant: Gary Hartzell and Phyllis Hartzell
Case Number: 5:2023cv04007
Filed: January 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Kenneth G Gale
Referring Judge: Eric F Melgren
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER: Estimated trial time 5 days. Mediation Notice or Confidential Settlement Report Due to Magistrate Judge on 6/1/2023. Mediation deadline 7/3/2023. Discovery deadline 10/2/2023. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 10/10/2023. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/17/2023 at 02:00 PM by telephone (KGG - CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 ACCESS CODE 5407703) before Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale. Dispositive motion deadline 11/10/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 3/13/23. (df)
March 13, 2023 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale: SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held on 3/13/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (df)
March 6, 2023 Filing 14 NOTICE OF SERVICE by Scott Osterman of Initial Disclosures (Bretz, Matthew)
March 3, 2023 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Defendants Initial Rule 26 Disclosures by Gary Hartzell, Phyllis Hartzell. (Mirakian, Christopher)
February 17, 2023 Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Defendants Opening Standard Interrogatories to Plaintiff and First Request for Production of Documents to Plaintiff by Gary Hartzell, Phyllis Hartzell (Mirakian, Christopher)
February 17, 2023 Filing 11 DESIGNATION OF COMPARATIVE FAULT by Defendants Gary Hartzell, Phyllis Hartzell. (Mirakian, Christopher)
February 17, 2023 Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED ANSWER & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Petition by Gary Hartzell, Phyllis Hartzell. (Mirakian, Christopher)
February 2, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE OF SERVICE by Scott Osterman of Discovery. (Bretz, Matthew)
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 3/13/2023 at 10:00 AM by Telephone KGG - CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 ACCESS CODE 5407703 before Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 3/3/2023. Proposed Scheduling Order Deadline 3/3/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 1/30/23. (cc)
January 30, 2023 Filing 7 ANSWER & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Petition by Gary Hartzell, Phyllis Hartzell. (Mirakian, Christopher)
January 30, 2023 Filing 6 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendants Gary Hartzell, Phyllis Hartzell - trial to be held in Topeka. (Mirakian, Christopher)
January 30, 2023 Filing 5 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE and Designation of Lead Counsel by Scott D. Hofer on behalf of Gary Hartzell, Phyllis Hartzell. (Hofer, Scott)
January 30, 2023 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Removal in State Court by Gary Hartzell, Phyllis Hartzell. (Mirakian, Christopher)
January 30, 2023 Filing 3 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Christopher R. Mirakian on behalf of Gary Hartzell, Phyllis Hartzell. (Mirakian, Christopher)
January 30, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendants Gary Hartzell, Phyllis Hartzell. (Mirakian, Christopher)
January 30, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Dickinson County, Kansas, case number DK-2023-CV-000002, trial location of Topeka (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5971845.), filed by Phyllis Hartzell, Gary Hartzell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Petition, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Gary Hartzell, #3 Exhibit C - Affidavit of Phyllis Hartzell, #4 Exhibit D - State Court Pleadings) (Mirakian, Christopher)
January 30, 2023 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Eric F. Melgren and Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jsh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osterman v. Hartzell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Osterman
Represented By: Matthew L. Bretz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Hartzell
Represented By: Scott D. Hofer
Represented By: Christopher R. Mirakian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phyllis Hartzell
Represented By: Scott D. Hofer
Represented By: Christopher R. Mirakian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?