Davis (ID 83253) v. Kansas, State of et al
Kevin Tamar Davis |
Kansas, State of and David L. Dahl |
5:2024cv03097 |
June 14, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas |
John W Lungstrum |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Petitioner Kevin Tamar Davis. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit By a Prisoner, #2 Letter to Judge Lungstrum, #3 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 8 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Robert C. Hutchison on behalf of All Defendants (Hutchison, Robert) |
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY mailed to pro se party Kevin Tamar Davis by regular mail. Response deadline 7/15/2024. (smnd) |
Filing 5 NOTICE for Relief By a Person in State Custody by Petitioner Kevin Tamar Davis. (smnd) |
Filing 4 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT of Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Kevin Tamar Davis. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement) (smnd) |
Filing 3 Letter to Clerk of the Court from Petitioner Kevin Tamar Davis re #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (smnd) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus by Petitioner Kevin Tamar Davis. (smnd) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS filed by Petitioner Kevin Tamar Davis. (Attachments: #1 Appendix List and Appendix A-L) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.