Owens v. Befort et al
Freddie A. Owens |
Jay Beford, Timothy L. Fielder, Goppert State Service Bank and Goppert State Service Bank Board of Directors |
5:2025cv04019 |
February 28, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas |
Eric F Melgren |
Rachel E Schwartz |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Freddie A. Owens - trial to be held in Topeka. (nac) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Freddie A. Owens. (nac) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (No Summons Issued) with trial location of Topeka, filed by Freddie A. Owens. (Attachments: #1 Supplement to Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J)(nac) |
FILING FEE PAID: in the amount of $405, receipt number 500002144. (nac) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Eric F. Melgren and Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at https://www.uscourts.gov/file/459/download (nac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.