Wilken Partners, L.P. v. Champps Operating Corporation
Plaintiff: Wilken Partners, L.P.
Defendant: Champps Operating Corporation
Case Number: 6:2011cv01005
Filed: January 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Wichita Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Kenneth G. Gale
Presiding Judge: Eric F. Melgren
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1446
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 30 Motion to Compel Arbitration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 4/4/2011. Mailed to Plaintiff c/o Jerry Rios (attorney for Champps Operation Corporation) by certified mail. (df)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilken Partners, L.P. v. Champps Operating Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wilken Partners, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Champps Operating Corporation
Represented By: Jay F. Fowler
Represented By: Amy S. Lemley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?