Madrid v. Williams

Plaintiff: Maria Madrid
Defendant: Ben D. Williams
Case Number: 6:2012cv01033
Filed: January 19, 2012
Court: Kansas District Court
Office: Wichita Office
County: Finney
Referring Judge: Karen M. Humphreys
Presiding Judge: Carlos Murguia
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 19, 2012 24 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order; granting 17 Defendant's Motion for the disclosure of protected healthcare information. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Humphreys on 6/19/2012. (sj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Madrid v. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Madrid
Represented By: Derek S. Casey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ben D. Williams
Represented By: Christopher S. Cole
Represented By: Steven C. Day
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.