Griffin v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

Plaintiff: Sharon K. Griffin
Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Case Number: 6:2012cv01295
Filed: August 15, 2012
Court: Kansas District Court
Office: Wichita Office
County: Sedgwick
Presiding Judge: J. Thomas Marten
Referring Judge: Gerald L. Rushfelt
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29:1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 1, 2012 7 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 11/1/2012. (jlw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Griffin v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharon K. Griffin
Represented By: Michael Lee Baumberger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Robyn Lyn Anderson
Represented By: Richard N. Bien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.