Isham v. Boeing Company, The
Plaintiff:
Brad Isham
Defendant:
Boeing Company, The
Case Number:
6:2013cv01098
Filed:
March 8, 2013
Court:
Kansas District Court
Office:
Wichita Office
County:
Sedgwick
Presiding Judge:
Richard D. Rogers
Referring Judge:
K. Gary Sebelius
Nature of Suit:
Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:
28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
May 22, 2013 | 20 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Isham v. Boeing Company, The | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brad Isham | |
Represented By: | Albert F. Kuhl |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Boeing Company, The | |
Represented By: | Shannon L. Cade |
Represented By: | Stanley G. Schroeder |
Represented By: | Nicholas J. Walker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.