McDonald v. Wichita, Kansas, City of, et al.
| Mary McDonald |
| Wichita, Kansas, City of and Gary Rebenstorf |
| 6:2014cv01020 |
| January 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Wichita Office |
| Sedgwick |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Kathryn H. Vratil |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
195
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 191 Movants' Unopposed Motion for Relief from the Court's Disqualification Orders; granting 194 Movants' Renewed Unopposed Motion for Relief from the Court's Disqualification Orders. See Memorandum and Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 7/11/17. (sj)
|
|
Filing
147
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 138 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 141 Defendants' Motion in Limine. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 1/13/17. (sj)
|
|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Overruling 60 Motion for Leave to File Under Seal - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion To File Documents Under Seal (Doc #60) filed May 22, 2015 be and hereby is OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before June 20, 2015, defendants may file an unsealed memorandum and the exhibits in support of their motion for summary judgment. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 06/15/2015. (sv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
