Carter v. Spirit Aerosystems, Inc.
Mark Anthony Carter |
Spirit Aerosystems, Inc. |
6:2016cv01350 |
September 9, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Wichita Office |
Sedgwick |
Gwynne E. Birzer |
Eric F. Melgren |
Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 171 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Defendant Spirit AeroSystems, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 149 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff Mark Anthony Carter's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 166 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff Mark Anthony Carter's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 165 ) is DENIED. This case is now closed. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 8/8/2019. (mam) |
Filing 139 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 131 Motion to Quash or Modify two subpoenas for medical records; denying 138 Motion to Quash the subpoena issued to Plaintiff's wife. The deposition of Ms. Carter must occur within 14 days of the filing of this o rder, at the location selected by Defendant. Although the discovery deadline is 11/30/18, discovery is extended solely for the limited purpose of completing the discovery sought in the disputed subpoenas. See order for additional details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 11/29/18. (adc) |
Filing 133 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 108 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint; denying 120 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel; finding as moot Spirit's Motion for Extension of Time to file a motion to compel 122 ; granting 130 Plai ntiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Motion to Reconsider the Court's orders herein. The 14-day time in which Plaintiff must file any motion for reconsideration of the above rulings by the undersigned magistrate judge un der D. Kan. Rule 7.3(b), or a motion for review by the district judge under D. Kan. Rule 72.1.4(a) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), does not begin until the date this written order is filed. See order for additional details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 11/13/18. (adc) |
Filing 106 ORDER memorializing the conference held 8/17/18. The Court grants Plaintiff's 95 Motion for Extension of Time to File his motion for leave to amend. Motion for leave to amend complaint due 8/24/18. The parties' oral motion to determine mediator is granted 102 ; parties must file a joint notice of mediation by 9/7/18; Mediation deadline 10/5/2018. Defendant's oral motion to determine parameters of Plaintiff's deposition is granted 103 . Defendant's oral motion to postpone Rule 35 exam is denied; Defendant's oral motion to modify schedule is granted 104 . Plaintiff's oral motion for extension of time to file motion to compel discovery is granted 105 . SEE WRITTEN ORDER FOR DETAILS AND DEADLINES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 8/17/18. (adc) |
Filing 87 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 71 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant United States Department of Labor is dismissed from this case. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 6/1/2018. (sz) |
Filing 67 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 38 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Foulston is hereby dismissed from this suit. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 11/13/2017. (aa) |
Filing 62 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 34 Motion to Amend Complaint.; denying 54 Motion to Clarify; denying 54 Motion for Leave to File; granting 23 Motion to Dismiss; granting 23 Motion for More Definite Statement. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 10/27/2017. (cm) |
Filing 51 ORDER denying 31 Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify Counsel; finding as moot 31 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order. A status conference is set for October 2, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. via telephone conference call to be initiated by the Court. See Order for additional information and deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 8/31/17. (sj) |
Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 13 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel; Randall K. Rathbun provisionally appointed for Mark Anthony Carter; granting 17 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File amended complaint - deadline e xtended to June 23, 2017; granting 19 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion to Compel- deadline extended to July 31, 2017. The status conference currently set for July 19, 2017 at 11:00 a.m. will proceed in person in Courtroom 326. See Memorandum and Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 5/22/17.Mailed to pro se party Mark Anthony Carter by regular mail (sj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Carter v. Spirit Aerosystems, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mark Anthony Carter | |
Represented By: | Randall K. Rathbun |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Spirit Aerosystems, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Sharon E. Rye |
Represented By: | Teresa L. Shulda |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.