HydroChem, LLC v. Keating et al
||Loren Keating, Evergreen Environmental Services, L.L.C. and Industrial Services Acquisition, LLC
||November 6, 2017
||US District Court for the District of Kansas
||XX US, Outside State
||Teresa J. James
||J. Thomas Marten
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Statutory Actions
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 26, 2018
ORDER REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER DISPUTE, denying 44 Defendant Keating's Motion for Protective Order; granting in part and denying in part 46 Plaintiff's Motion in Support of Entry of Protective Order. Plaintiff has shown good cause fo r entry of its proposed two-tier protective order and it shall be adopted by the Court, but subject to the parties' further efforts to confer on the definition of and what specific information may be designated as "Highly Confidential Infor mation," and who shall be permitted to view it. If, after conferring, the parties still disagree over the potential additional or revised terms, counsel shall email chambers a short summary describing their positions (with their proposed protect ive order language) on the remaining disputes by 12:00 PM noon on 4/6/2018 and the undersigned Magistrate Judge will conduct a Telephone Conference on 4/9/2018 at 01:30 PM. Participating counsel must dial 1-888-363-4749 and enter ACCESS CODE 4901386 to join the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 3/26/2018. (byk)
|November 15, 2017
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying without prejudice 12 Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 11/15/2017. (byk)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?