Watson v. USD 500
| Carmen N. Watson |
| USD 500 |
| 6:2019cv01044 |
| February 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Eric F Melgren |
| James P O'Hara |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER re #14 Application for Clerks Entry of Default filed by Carmen N. Watson. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 4/25/2019. Mailed to pro se party Carmen N. Watson by regular mail (cm)
|
| MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #12 MOTION to Change Venue Determine Place of Trial. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge. (amh) |
| Filing 17 SUPPLEMENT to #15 Response to Motion by Plaintiff Carmen N. Watson. (sz) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE to #14 Application for Clerks Entry of Default by Defendant USD 500. (Goheen, Gregory) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Carmen N. Watson re #12 Defendant's Motion to Determine Place of Trial. (mam) |
| Filing 14 APPLICATION FOR CLERKS ENTRY OF DEFAULT by Carmen N. Watson. (mam) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #12 MOTION to Change Venue Determine Place of Trial by Defendant USD 500(Goheen, Gregory) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Change Venue Determine Place of Trial by Defendant USD 500. (Goheen, Gregory) Modified on 4/25/2019 to remove referral information. (mam) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #10 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant USD 500 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Goheen, Gregory) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant USD 500 (Goheen, Gregory) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Carmen N. Watson re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint or other Responsive Pleading or, in the Alternative, for Leave to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading Out of Time (sz) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 motion for extension of time until April 23, 2019, for defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Defendant asserts it was not properly served with summons by the U.S. Marshalls, but on March 19, 2019, received a copy of the summons packet. The court therefore deems defendant served and sets the response deadline to avoid confusion. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 4/9/2019. Mailed to pro se party by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (amh)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint or other Responsive Pleading or, in the Alternative, for Leave to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading Out of Time by Defendant USD 500 (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Goheen, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 RETURN Certified Mail received re #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, addressed to Carmen N. Watson. Return to Sender - Unclaimed. Document not remailed. (heo) |
| NOTICE Re: Pro Se Mailing. Document #5 Return of Service of Summons Executed mailed to pro se Plaintiff Carmen N. Watson at 5659 Sloan Avenue, Kansas City, KS 66104 on 3/25/2019 by regular mail. (jk) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Carmen N. Watson upon USD 500 served on 3/11/2019, answer due 4/1/2019. (jk) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If not previously provided, plaintiff is directed to provide the address of the named defendant by no later than March 14, 2019, so that the Clerk of the Court may proceed with service of process. The Clerk shall issue summons to the US Marshal or Deputy Marshal, who are appointed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3). Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 2/27/2019. Mailed to pro se party Carmen N. Watson by regular and certified mail; Certified Tracking Number: 7018 0680 0001 8174 1158. (heo)
|
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to USD 500 (issued to US Marshal for service). NEF was mailed to Carmen N. Watson at 5659 Sloan Avenue, Kansas City, KS 66104. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jk) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Carmen N. Watson. (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Financial Status) NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (jk) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Carmen N. Watson. (jk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita, filed by Carmen N. Watson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Watson v. USD 500 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carmen N. Watson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USD 500 | |
| Represented By: | Gregory P. Goheen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
