Dreymoor Fertilizers Overseas Pte. Ltd. v. AVAgro, LLC, et al
| 6:2020mc00105 |
| May 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Wichita Office |
| Other |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 83 Motion to Appoint Receiver. Petitioner must submit proposed order for appointment of specific receiver, delineating the receiver's duties and term, by the end of this week. Respondent has 3 days to file any objections to the proposed order, and objections are limited to 5 pages. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 11/2/2021. (cm)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 34 Motion for Relief and/or for Clarification; denying 38 Motion to Quash and/or for Protective Order. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 5/29/2020. (cm)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion for Judgment; granting 1 Motion for Order. Plaintiff's specific requests in the emergency application for order for post judgment remedies is denied but the Court grants certain post-judgment remedies as specified in the order. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 5/22/2020. (cm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dreymoor Fertilizers Overseas Pte. Ltd. v. AVAgro, LLC, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
