Greer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Rylee Greer
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Case Number: 6:2021cv01103
Filed: April 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Teresa J James
Referring Judge: Holly L Teeter
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 7/19/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James. To join the conference, counsel shall dial CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 and enter ACCESS CODE 4901386. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline 6/28/2021. Report of Parties Planning Meeting and Rule 26 Initial Disclosures due 7/12/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 6/4/21. (ct)
June 4, 2021 Filing 15 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company - trial to be held in Wichita. (West, Craig)
June 4, 2021 Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company identifying None as corporate parent . (West, Craig)
June 4, 2021 Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.(West, Craig)
May 25, 2021 Filing 12 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 6/11/2021 for Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 5/25/2021. (jk)
May 13, 2021 Filing 11 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- certified mail by Rylee Greer upon State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company served on 5/7/2021, answer due 5/28/2021 (Lattin, Robert)
May 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER. On April 21, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. #6 . Plaintiff initially filed a response that did not establish subject-matter jurisdiction #7 , and the Court issued a second show-cause order #8 . Plaintiff has now responded and adequately alleged the citizenship of all parties. #9 . Based on the information provided, the Court finds that Plaintiff has satisfied the burden to show why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction at this juncture. No amendment of the complaint is required to comply with the Court's show-cause order. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 5/4/2021. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(md)
May 4, 2021 Filing 9 RESPONSE re #8 Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Rylee Greer (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Lattin, Robert) Modified on 5/5/2021 to remove duplicate exhibit text (ctv).
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response is due by 5/7/2021. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 5/3/2021. (md)
May 3, 2021 Filing 7 Response to #6 Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Rylee Greer (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Lattin, Robert) Modified on 5/3/2021 to change title of entry and terminate motion (sz).\
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 5/5/2021. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 4/21/2021. (sz)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Michael E. Carr for Rylee Greer pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 4/21/2021. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (kas)
April 20, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION for attorney Michael E. Carr to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5467383.) by Plaintiff Rylee Greer (Attachments: #1 Affidavit AFF OF MOT APPEAR PRO HAC VICE, #2 ECF Registration Form PRO HAC VICE ECF)(Lattin, Robert)
April 20, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Rylee Greer. (Lattin, Robert)
April 20, 2021 Filing 2 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Rylee Greer - trial to be held in Wichita. (Lattin, Robert)
April 20, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5467363.), filed by Rylee Greer.(Lattin, Robert)
April 20, 2021 SUMMONS ISSUED as to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (issued to Attorney for service). (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jk)
April 20, 2021 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Holly L. Teeter and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Greer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Represented By: Craig W. West
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rylee Greer
Represented By: Robert W. Lattin
Represented By: Michael E. Carr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?