Smith v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff: Kristy D. Smith
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party: Social Security Regional Administrator
Case Number: 6:2021cv01267
Filed: November 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Julie A Robinson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2021 Filing 8 Summons Returned Executed -- Office of the Regional Counsel served by Certified Mail on 11/23/2021. (jk)
December 6, 2021 Filing 7 Summons Returned Executed -- United States Attorney General served by Certified Mail on 11/29/2021. (jk)
November 10, 2021 Filing 6 Summons Returned Executed -- United States Attorney served by Personal Service on 11/10/2021, answer due 1/10/2022. (jk)
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall issue summons to the US Marshal or Deputy Marshal, who are appointed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3). Plaintiff or plaintiff's counsel directed to IMMEDIATELY prepare and submit summons to the Clerk for service. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 11/8/2021. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (sn)
November 8, 2021 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (issued to US Marshal for service). (jk)
November 5, 2021 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk)
November 4, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. by Plaintiff Kristy D. Smith (Overton, Kathleen)
November 4, 2021 Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Kristy D. Smith - trial to be held in Wichita. (Overton, Kathleen)
November 4, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Kristy D. Smith. (Overton, Kathleen)
November 4, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita, filed by Kristy D. Smith.(Overton, Kathleen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristy D. Smith
Represented By: Kathleen E. Overton
Represented By: Kelsey Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Regional Administrator
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?