Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Williams et al
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company |
Brandy Williams, Jeremy Williams and Ray Barber |
6:2022cv01174 |
August 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Angel D Mitchell |
Holly L Teeter |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Roggow, Curtis) |
***Civil Case Terminated per chambers and #3 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal.(kao) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Brandy Williams, Jeremy Williams (issued to Attorney for service). (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jk) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company identifying None as corporate parent . (Roggow, Curtis) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5841184.), filed by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Roggow, Curtis) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Holly L. Teeter and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.