Ermold et al v. Davis et al
||David Ermold and David Moore
||July 10, 2015
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
||David L. Bunning
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 18, 2022
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER : 1) Deft's 93 and 84 Motions for Summary Judgment are DENIED; 2) The Ermold Pla's 88 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 3) The Yates Pla's 81 Motion for Summary J udgment is GRANTED; 4) Deft's Ermold 94 and Yates 85 Motions for Leave to File Excess Pages GRANTED; 5) Defts' Motions For Leave to File Answers Ermold 96 andYates 87 are GRANTED; 6) a Telephonic STATUS CONFERENCE is set for 4/1/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge David L. Bunning. The parties must dial in to the conference at least 5 minutes before the scheduled time by taking the following steps: Call AT&T Teleconferencing at 1-877-336-1839; and Enter Access code 8854898. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 3/18/22.(JLS)cc: COR
|September 15, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER, 1) Defendant 29 MOTION to Dismiss by Kim Davis, Amended Complaint is granted in part , as to Plaintiff's claims against Kim Davis in her official capacity and denied in part as to Pla intiff's claims against Kim Davis in her personal capacity 2) Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 27 is dismissed with respect to Plaintiff's claims against Kim Davis in her official capacity .. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 9/15/17.(SMT)cc: COR
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?