Sims v. Family Dollar, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael Sims
Defendant: Family Dollar, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2016cv00091
Filed: July 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Ashland Office
County: Rowan
Presiding Judge: Henry R. Wilhoit
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Plaintiff's Motion to Remand DE 6 be SUSTAINED and this matter be REMANDED to Rowan Circuit Court. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 9/13/16.(KSS)cc: COR, Rowan Circuit Court Clerk (via US Mail)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sims v. Family Dollar, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Sims
Represented By: Bernard R. Mazaheri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Family Dollar, Inc.
Represented By: J. Andrew Inman
Represented By: LaToi D. Mayo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?