Gilbert-Bey v. Smith

Petitioner: Reginald Thaddeus Gilbert-Bey
Respondent: Thomas B. Smith
Case Number: 0:2017cv00102
Filed: September 21, 2017
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: Ashland Office
County: Boyd
Referring Judge: P SO
Presiding Judge: Henry R. Wilhoit
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2018 Opinion or Order 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Petitioner Gilbert-Bey's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2241 DE 1 is DENIED. 2. Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously with this MO&O. 3. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 2/13/18.(KSS)cc: COR, Gilbert-Bey (via US mail)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gilbert-Bey v. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Reginald Thaddeus Gilbert-Bey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Thomas B. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?