Cox et al v. General Motors LLC
| Steven Cox |
| General Motors LLC |
| 0:2019cv00062 |
| June 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Henry R Wilhoit |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Wilhoit for review: #9 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT (JLS) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION OF REMOVAL filed by Steven Cox, Steven Cox(Individually). (Wheeler, Andrew) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Wilhoit for review: #8 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT (JLS) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #1 Notice of Removal filed by General Motors LLC. (Bird, Melissa) |
Filing 7
ORDER : 1) within ten days the Deft shall file a memorandum in support of removal; 2) that within seven days thereafter, pla shall file a responsive memorandum; and 3) that in the event the Court determines that it cannot exercise jurisdiction, this action shall be remanded to the Boyd Circuit Court. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 6/28/19.(JLS)cc: COR
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by General Motors LLC.(Bird, Melissa) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by General Motors LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Bird, Melissa) |
| Filing 4 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by General Motors LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Motors Holdings LLC, Other Affiliate General Motors Company for General Motors LLC.. (Bird, Melissa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Melissa Foster Bird. #1 Notice of Removal, has been filed by General Motors LLC without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (JLS) |
| Conflict Check run. (JLS) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Wilhoit for jurisdictional review: #1 Notice of Removal filed by General Motors LLC (JLS) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Boyd County Circuit Court, Case Number 19-CI-447. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4396587), filed by General Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Record, Complaint and process, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cox et al v. General Motors LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Cox | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Luke Vincent |
| Represented By: | Andrew Kenneth Wheeler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: General Motors LLC | |
| Represented By: | Melissa Foster Bird |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
