Hafner v. Boyd County Detention Center et al
Plaintiff: Christopher J. Hafner
Defendant: Bill Hensley and Boyd County Detention Center
Case Number: 0:2020cv00119
Filed: October 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: P SO
Referring Judge: Gregory F VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2020 Filing 7 JUDGMENT: 1. Hafner's claims against the BCDC and Jailer Hensley R #1 are DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. This action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 10/20/20.(KSS)cc: CORand Hafner by US Mail
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Hafner's claims against the BCDC and Jailer Hensley R #1 are DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. 3. This action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 4. The Court will enter a corresponding Judgment. 5. Finally, nothing in this Order prevents Hafner from filing a new civil rights action in which he lists one or more BCDC medical providers - either named or unnanmed - as dfts and puts forth factual allegations and legal claims against those individuals. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 10/20/20.(KSS)cc: CORand Hafner by US Mail
October 8, 2020 Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Christopher J. Hafner, pro se. (JLS)
October 8, 2020 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher J. Hafner, pro se. (JLS)
October 6, 2020 Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(JLS)
October 6, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher J. Hafner, pro se.Motions referred to P SO. (JLS)
October 6, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT referred to Judge PSO, filed by Christopher J. Hafner, pro se. (Attachments: #1 env)(JLS)
October 6, 2020 Conflict Check run. (JLS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hafner v. Boyd County Detention Center et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bill Hensley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boyd County Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher J. Hafner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?