McClements v. Stones Trucking LLC et al
| Michael McClements |
| Stones Trucking LLC and Alvin Phillips |
| 0:2025cv00008 |
| January 17, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Edward B Atkins |
| David L Bunning |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER : 1) This matter be referred to US Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings. 2) the Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences; 3) Discovery disputes shall be resolved as set out herein.. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 8/15/22.(JLS)cc: COR
|
| Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Stones Trucking LLC identifying Corporate Parent Brian Stone, Corporate Parent Shawnita Stone for Stones Trucking LLC.. (JLS) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Boyd County Circuit Court, case number 24-CI-00977. ( Filing fee $405; receipt number AKYEDC-6013641), filed by Alvin Phillips, Stones Trucking LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JLS) |
| Conflict Check run. (JLS) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Bunning for jurisdictional review: #1 Notice of Removal. (JLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
