Schaffner v. United States Trustee

Appellee: United States Trustee
Appellant: Charles H. Schaffner
Case Number: 2:2012cv00167
Filed: August 7, 2012
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: Covington Office
County: Kenton
Presiding Judge: William O. Bertelsman
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28:0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 29, 2012 18 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION: This Court AFFIRMS IN PART and REVERSES IN PART . This matter is REMANDED to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Ky for proceedings consistent with this Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 11/29/2012.(TJZ)cc: COR, Charles H. Schaffner via U.S. Mail

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schaffner v. United States Trustee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: United States Trustee
Represented By: Rachelle Cathleen Dodson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Charles H. Schaffner
Represented By: Robert Lee Raper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?