Nail et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al

Defendant: Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, aaiPharma, Inc., aaiPharma LLC, AAI Development Services, Inc. and NeoSan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Plaintiff: Don Nail and Sheila Nail
Case Number: 2:2012cv00235
Filed: November 28, 2012
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: Covington Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Danny C. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 8, 2013 23 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 1. To the extent that the plaintiffs' consolidated response is construed as a motion for an abeyance, that motion is DENIED. 2. The claims asserted against Defendant Eli Lilly and Company by the following plainti ffs are DISMISSED, with prejudice: a. Civil Action No. 2: 12-235-DCR, Plaintiffs Don and Sheila Nail; b. Civil Action No. 2: 12-238-DCR, Plaintiffs Raymond Silver, Georgia Silver, Paulette Melancon, Jacqueline Pack, and Travis Reynolds as wrongful d eath beneficiary of the Estate of Ophelia Faye Reynolds; c. Civil Action No. 2: 12-242-DCR, Plaintiff Jeffrey A. Bennett; d. Civil Action No. 2: 12-243-DCR, Plaintiffs Sharon Collins, Linda Gilmore, and Lamar James; e. Civil Action No. 2: 12-249-DCR, Plaintiff Frances Bennett, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Juanita B. Martin; f. Civil Action No. 2: 12-250-DCR, Plaintiffs Mark Randal Stafford and Vicie Carolyn Stafford, husband and wife; g. Civil Action No. 2: 12-251-DCR, Plaintiffs Thomas R. Trent and Alma S. Trent, husband and wife; h. Civil Action No. 2: 12-252-DCR, Plaintiff Terry Danny King; i. Civil Action No. 2: 12-253-DCR, Plaintiffs Paulette Faith Moss and Roger Lee Moss, husband and wife; j. Civil Action No. 2: 12-254- DCR, Plaintiff Tina R. Tye; k. Civil Action No. 2: 13-001-DCR, Plaintiff Douglas Abraham, Special Administrator for the Estate of Ruth Britt. 3. The following claims remain pending: (a) the claims asserted against Lilly in Williams v. Eli Lilly and Company, Civil Action No. 2: 12-270-DCR; (b) the claims asserted against Lilly by Plaintiffs Donna and Andrew Wagenknecht in Silver, et al. v. Eli Lilly and Company, et al., Civil Action No. 2: 12-238-DCR; and (c) the claims asserted against Lill y by Plaintiffs Donald Shaw, James Pickens, Sr., and Linda Sue Chambless in Shaw, et al. v. Eli Lilly and Co., et al., Civil Action No. 2: 12-243-DCR. 4. The plaintiffs' motion to file an amended complaint in Civil Action No. 2: 12-238- DCR [MDL Record No. 2540] is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to file the First Amended Complaint previously tendered in that action. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/8/2013.Associated Cases: 2:11-md-02226-DCR et al.(CBD)cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nail et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company
Represented By: Charles H. Stopher
Represented By: Edward H. Stopher
Represented By: Kevin L. Murch
Represented By: Kimberly C. Metzger
Represented By: Mary Nold Larimore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: aaiPharma, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: aaiPharma LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AAI Development Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NeoSan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Don Nail
Represented By: Travis K. Siegel
Represented By: Richard W. Schulte
Represented By: Dianne M. Nast
Represented By: Mike Arias
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheila Nail
Represented By: Travis K. Siegel
Represented By: Richard W. Schulte
Represented By: Dianne M. Nast
Represented By: Mike Arias
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?