Schickel et al v. Dilger et al
Plaintiff: John Schickel, David Watson and Ken Moellman, Jr.
Case Number: 2:2015cv00155
Filed: August 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Covington Office
County: Boone
Presiding Judge: William O. Bertelsman
Presiding Judge: J. Gregory Wehrman
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 138 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: That Defs' motion to reconsider and amend order, or to stay enforcement of order 125 is DENIED. A permanent injunction enforcing the Court's prior Memorandum Opinion and Order shall enter concurrently herewith. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 12/1/2017.(ECO)cc: COR
June 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 122 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Defs motion for summary judgment 62 and Plfs motion for summary judgment and injunction 63 with respect to KRS § 121.150(6) be, and are hereby, DENIED as moot; 2) Defs' motion for summary judgment 62 and Plfs motion for summary judgment and injunction 63 with respect to KRS § 121.150(11) and KRS § 121.015(3)(b) be, and are hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, in line with the analysis above; 3) Defs motion fo r summary judgment 62 and Plfs motion for summary judgment and injunction 63 with respect to KRS § 121.150(13) 62 be, and are hereby, DENIED as moot; 4) Defs motion for summary judgment 62 and Plfs motion for summary judgment and injunction 63 with respect to KRS § 121.150(23) 62 be, and are hereby, DENIED as moot; 5) Defs motion for summary judgment 64 with respect to KRS § 6.751(2) be, and is hereby, DENIED; 6) Plfs motion for summary judgment and injunction 65 with respect to KRS § 121.751(2) be, and is hereby, GRANTED; 7) Defs motion for summary judgment 64 with respect to KRS § 6.811(4) be, and is hereby, DENIED; 8)Plfs motion for summary judgment and injunc tion 65 with respect to KRS § 6.811(4) be, and is hereby, GRANTED; 9) Defs motion for summary judgment 64 with respect to KRS § 6.767(1) be, and is hereby, DENIED; 10)Plfs motion for summary judgment and injunction 65 wi th respect to KRS § 6.767(1) be, and is hereby, GRANTED; 11) Defs motion for summary judgment 64 with respect to KRS § 6.811(6) be, and is hereby, DENIED; 12)Plfs motion for summary judgment and injunction 65 with respect to KRS § 6.811(6) be, and is hereby, GRANTED; 13) Defs motion for summary judgment 64 with respect to KRS § 6.767(2) be, and is hereby, GRANTED; 14)Plfs motion for summary judgment and injunction 65 with respect to KRS  67; 6.767(2) be, and is hereby, DENIED; 15) Defs motion for summary judgment 64 with respect to KRS § 6.811(7) be, and is hereby, GRANTED; 16)Plfs motion for summary judgment and injunction 65 with respect to KRS § 6.811(7 ) be, and is hereby, DENIED; 17) Defs motion for summary judgment 64 with respect to KRS § 6.811(5) be, and is hereby, DENIED; 18)Plfs motion for summary judgment and injunction 65 with respect to KRS § 6.811(5) be, and is hereby, GRANTED; and 19)The parties shall confer and draft a permanent injunction that comports with this Opinion and Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, and they shall file the proposed injunction within 20 days of entry of this Order. This shall not constitute a waiver of any partys right to contest or appeal the rulings adverse to them. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 6/6/2017.(ECO)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schickel et al v. Dilger et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Schickel
Represented By: Thomas B. Bruns
Represented By: Paul J. Darpel
Represented By: Jack S. Gatlin
Represented By: Christopher David Wiest
Represented By: Robert A. Winter, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Watson
Represented By: Thomas B. Bruns
Represented By: Paul J. Darpel
Represented By: Jack S. Gatlin
Represented By: Christopher David Wiest
Represented By: Robert A. Winter, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ken Moellman, Jr.
Represented By: Thomas B. Bruns
Represented By: Paul J. Darpel
Represented By: Jack S. Gatlin
Represented By: Christopher David Wiest
Represented By: Robert A. Winter, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?