Ernst v. White

Petitioner: Shawn William Ernst
Respondent: Randy White
Case Number: 2:2017cv00219
Filed: November 30, 2017
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: Covington Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Robert E. Wier
Presiding Judge: Danny C. Reeves
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 12, 2018 21 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT: 1) Petitioner Ernst's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. 2) A Certificate of Appealability shall not issue. 3) This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 2/12/2018.(TJZ)cc: COR, Shawn Ernst via US Mail

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ernst v. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Shawn William Ernst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Randy White
Represented By: James C. Shackelford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?