Scott v. International Paper Company et al
| Robert Scott |
| International Paper Company and Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv00211 |
| December 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| William O Bertelsman |
| Candace J Smith |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: That the call of this matter at Docket call on Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 1:00 p.m. be, and hereby is, VACATED. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 2/26/2019.(ECO)cc: COR
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order)(Thompson, Lauren) |
| Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Thompson, Lauren) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of William O. Bertelsman for review: #10 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (ECO) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: That said DOCKET CALL be, and hereby is, set for WEDNESDAY,MARCH 13, 2019 AT 1:00 P.M., to be held at the United States Courthouse, 35 West Fifth Street, Covington, Kentucky in the 5th Floor Courtroom. The parties shall confer and file a proposed scheduling order at least three (3) days before docket call. Counsel must attend the docket call in person and be sufficiently familiar with the case to answer any inquires the Court may have. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 2/15/2019.(ECO)cc: COR
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by International Paper Company. (Vonderbrink, Sarah) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. for Hatzel & Buehler, Inc... (Higgins, Jane) |
| Filing 6 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. for Hatzel & Buehler, Inc... (Higgins, Jane) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, James Higgins. #1 Notice of Removal, has been filed by Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (ECO) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to presiding Magistrate Judge to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, hold hearings as required, and rule on nondispositive motions. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of court to the undersigned. Subject to other provisions of law, the final pretrial conference and trial will be before the undersigned, unless the parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 USC 636(c). Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 6/18/2010.(ECO)cc: COR
|
| Conflict Check run. (ECO) |
| Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by International Paper Company. (ECO) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Mason Circuit Court, case number 18-CI-289. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4249664), filed by Hatzel & Buehler, Inc., International Paper Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record -Complaint, #2 State Court Record -Summons, #3 Mason County Filing -Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(ECO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
