In Re Attorney Admission for Mark C. Bissinger
In Re: Attorney Admission Application
Case Number: 2:2019aa00011
Filed: October 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Danny C Reeves
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2019 Filing 5 Certificate of Attorney Admission(cc: COR w/letter and packet)(SKV)
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ATTORNEY ADMISSION ORDER . Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 11/1/2019. (cc: COR)(TDA)
November 1, 2019 Attorney Admission Order Submitted to Judge Danny C. Reeves(TDA)
October 28, 2019 Filing 3 KY Bar Check Completed(LFV)
October 15, 2019 Filing 2 Out of State Bar Check from Ohio(CBD)
October 11, 2019 Filing 1 Application for Attorney Admission from Mark C. Bissinger (Attachments: #1 Authorization and Release, #2 Affidavit of Sponsor Mark G. Arnzen, Jr., #3 Receipt)(TJZ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re Attorney Admission for Mark C. Bissinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: Attorney Admission Application
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?