USA v. $45,044.00 in United States Currency
| USA |
| $45,044.00 in United States Currency |
| Carlos Manuel Cruz-Zuniga |
| 2:2022cv00077 |
| June 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Edward B Atkins |
| William O Bertelsman |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 FIRST ANSWER to #1 Complaint to Verified Complaint by Carlos Manuel Cruz-Zuniga.(Slicer, Charles) |
Filing 11
ORDER: That motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Charles W. Slicer, III #9 is GRANTED and that the he be permitted to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Claimant, Carlos Manuel Cruz-Zuniga in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 7/18/2022. (ECO)cc: COR
|
| Filing 10 Pro Hac Vice Filing fee received - Charles W. Slicer, III - $ 125.00, receipt number 200000121 (ECO) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Edward B. Atkins for review: re #9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Charles W. Spicer, III. (ECO) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY TO Charles Slicer re #9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice; attorney failed tosubmit the appropriate $125.00 filing fee; within 7 calendar days,attorney shall submit the $125.00 filing fee to the Clerk. cc: COR (ECO) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION TO Charles Slicer re #9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vicere; Error: the incorrect event "CLAIM Verified" was selected. Entry by Attorney; Clerk re-defined the document as a Motion to Appeal Pro Hac Vice. No further action required by counsel. cc: COR. Modified text on on 7/11/2022 (ECO). |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Edward B. Atkins for review: re #9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (ECO) |
| Filing 9 MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE by Carlos Manuel Cruz-Zuniga. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Charles W. Slicer , #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order)(Slicer, Charles) Modified to redefine document on 7/11/2022 (ECO). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY Charles W. Slicer, IIII by Clerk re: L.R. 83 - Attorney Admission procedures w/ a copy of L.R. 83.1 and 83.2 (ECO) Modified on 7/8/2022 (ECO). Modified text on 7/8/2022 (ECO). |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT re #6 Claim Verified by $45,044.00 in United States Currency. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certificate of Good Standing)(Slicer, Charles) |
| Filing 6 CLAIM Verified in Accordance to Rule G(5) by $45,044.00 in United States Currency. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Defendant)(Slicer, Charles) |
| Filing 5 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN of Service filed by USA. In USMU custody as of 12/23/2021 (ECO) |
| Filing 4 Warrant in Rem Issued as to $45,044.00 in United States Currency; 1 attested copy with completed USM-285 form(s) to the US Marshal for service at the email address KYE.Warrants@usdoj.gov (Attachments: #1 USM - 285)(ECO) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/10/2022: #2 Receipt) (ECO). (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/10/2022: #3 Additional Receipt) (ECO). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Issuance of Warrant in rem by USA (Attachments: #1 Warrant of Arrest, #2 USM-285)(ECO) |
| Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED), filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Richard C. Bernecker, #2 Affidavit of Richard C. Bernecker)(ECO) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/9/2022: #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (ECO). |
| Conflict Check run. (ECO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
