McPherson v. SSA
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Dean McPherson
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Case Number: 3:2021cv00036
Filed: August 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Henry R Wilhoit
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed via USM to Commissioner of SSA served on 8/16/2021. Service to U.S. Attorney executed via USM on 8/13/2021; Service to U.S. Attorney General executed via USM on 8/17/2021. (JJ)
August 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Commissioner of SSA. (Morgan, Cheryl)
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of SSA, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Summons issued and delivered to U.S. Marshal for service (Attachments: #1 Summons US Attorney, #2 Summons US Attorney General)(JJ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/11/2021: #3 USM Receipt) (JJ).
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [R. #3 ] is SUSTAINED. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 8/11/2021. (JJ)cc: COR
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Motion for Melissa A. Palmer Admission Pro Hac Vice [Docket No. #4 ] by Plaintiff Nathaniel Dean McPherson is SUSTAINED. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 8/11/2021. (JJ)cc: COR Modified link on 8/11/2021 (JJ).
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Melissa A. Palmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Nathaniel Dean McPherson ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-5039291) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order)(Palmer, Melissa)
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order BAR STATUS Check completed as to Melissa Palmer re #4 MOTION for Melissa A. Palmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Nathaniel Dean McPherson ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-5039291). (CBD)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (JJ)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nathaniel Dean McPherson (JJ)
August 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nathaniel Dean McPherson (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(JJ)
August 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Nathaniel Dean McPherson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Appeal Counsel Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Letter to Clerk, #4 Summons US Attorney's Office, #5 Summons SSA, #6 Summons US Attorney General, #7 USM-285 US Attorney's Office, #8 USM-285 SSA, #9 USM-285 US Attorney General)(JJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McPherson v. SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Dean McPherson
Represented By: Melissa Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Represented By: Cheryl D. Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?