Caudill v. Conover

Petitioner: Virginia S. Caudill
Respondent: Janet Conover
Case Number: 5:2010cv00084
Filed: March 8, 2010
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: Lexington Office
Presiding Judge: Danny C. Reeves
Referring Judge: James B Todd
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 14, 2012 33 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER: 26 MOTION for Discovery and MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing & 27 MOTION to Appoint Expert are DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B Atkins on 05/14/2012.(KLB)cc: COR
January 31, 2014 34 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Caudill's 1 Petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 1/31/2014.(STC)cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caudill v. Conover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Virginia S. Caudill
Represented By: Dennis J. Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Janet Conover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.