Shults v. SSA
Plaintiff: Joshua Ray Shults
Defendant: SSA
Case Number: 5:2013cv00144
Filed: May 24, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Bath
Presiding Judge: David L. Bunning
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Decision of Commissioner AFFIRMED; (2) Plaintiff's 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment DENIED; (3) Defendant's 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment GRANTED. Judgment in favor of Dft Commissioner will be entered. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 2/27/2014.(STC)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shults v. SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Ray Shults
Represented By: Dennis M. Stutsman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?