Bishop v. SSA
Plaintiff: Michael Bishop
Defendant: SSA
Case Number: 5:2013cv00200
Filed: June 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Bath
Presiding Judge: Joseph M. Hood
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: (1) 12 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. (2) 13 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. (3) Decision of SSA is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED to Commissioner for further proceedings consistent w this Opinion and ORder. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 1/9/2014. (SCD)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bishop v. SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Bishop
Represented By: Roger Donald Riggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SSA
Represented By: John S. Osborn, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?