Helton v. SSA

Plaintiff: Nancy Marie Helton
Defendant: SSA
Case Number: 5:2013cv00217
Filed: July 9, 2013
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: Lexington Office
County: Lee
Presiding Judge: William O. Bertelsman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 25, 2014 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendations 22 is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that the decision of the Commissioner is hereby affirmed ; that plaintiff's motion for s/j 20 is denied; and that defendant's motion for s/j 21 is granted . A separate Judgment shall enter concurrently herewith. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 09/25/2014.(lc)cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Helton v. SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy Marie Helton
Represented By: Wolodymyr Cybriwsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?