Hosseini v. Beers et al
Plaintiff: Mehrdad Hosseini
Case Number: 5:2014cv00404
Filed: October 28, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Karen K. Caldwell
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 OPINION & ORDER: (1) DENYING pla's 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment; (2) the decision of USCIS denying Housseini's adjustment of status application is AFFIRMED; (3) judgment will be entered. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 11/27/17.(KJR)cc: COR
September 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: (1) The 5 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Pla's Complaint is DISMISSED as to all parties and claims. (2) Pla's 7 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and 8 Motion to Amend are DENIED AS MOOT. (3) This case is STRICKEN from the Court's active docket. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on September 11, 2015. (AWD) cc: COR,Pla via US Mail
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hosseini v. Beers et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mehrdad Hosseini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?