Rocha v. Quintana
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 25, 2018
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DENIED AS MOOT; 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket; 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 5/25/2018.(KM)cc: COR, Petitioner via U.S. mail
|March 21, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Clerk shall prepare copies of following documents and forward each by certified mail to Respondent Quintana, Attorney General for the US, and US Attorney for EDKY: a. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 and b. t his Order. 2. Respondent shall file response to petition w/in 60 days, in form of memorandum addressing factual allegations and legal claims. 3. Rocha must keep Clerk informed of current mailing address. Failure to notify Clerk of any address ch ange may result in dismissal of case. 4. Rocha must send a copy of every document he files with Court to Respondent or its attorney. Must certify he has done so. 5. Rocha must communicate with Court solely through notices or motions filed. Court will disregard correspondence sent directly to judge's chambers.. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 3/21/2018.(GLD)cc: Pro se Petitioner, Atty Gen for US via cert mail; US Atty EDKY via cert mail; Respondent Warden Quintana via cert mail
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?