McKinney v. Napier et al
Plaintiff: Robert Willis McKinney
Defendant: Angela Napier, Michelle Weigel, Kelly Napier and Daniel Napier
Case Number: 5:2018cv00031
Filed: January 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Joseph M. Hood
Presiding Judge: Hanly A. Ingram
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 117 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) All remaining claims against Defendant Angela Napier are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b) due to Plaintiff Robert McKinney's failure to prosecute; and(2) The Clerk of the Court shall STRIKE THIS MATTER FROM THE COURTS ACTIVE DOCKET. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 2/13/18.(JLM)cc: COR,pla & dft (US Mail)
June 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 104 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) 87 MOTION for Default Judgment is DENIED. (2) Pla shall SHOW CAUSE w/in 14 days of entry of this order why his Amended Complaint should not be dismissed w respect to Dft Angela Napier and this matter stricken from the active docket. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 6/19/2018.(SCD)cc: COR,Pro Se Pla(via US Mail)
January 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 59 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale. Motion to strike (DN 42 ) is denied. Claims in amended complaint (DN 41 ) to proceed as set forth. Clerk to add Kelly Napier and Daniel Napier as defendants to docket. Clerk to forward copy o f complaint, amended complaint and this memorandum opinion and order to Justice & Public Safety Cabinet as set forth. Clerk to prepare summons at address provided by Justice & Public Safety Cabinet if waiver of service is not returned. cc: Counsel, plaintiff pro se, Justice & Public Safety Cabinet, Defendants A. Napier, K. Napier, D. Napier(JAC) [Transferred from kywd on 1/25/2018.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McKinney v. Napier et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Willis McKinney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Angela Napier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle Weigel
Represented By: Edward A. Baylous, II
Represented By: Kristin Wehking
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kelly Napier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Napier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?