Huntley v. Lucas County Division of Child Support Services, Lucas County Ohio
| Edwin Huntley |
| Lucas County Division of Child Support Services, Lucas County Ohio |
| 5:2018cv00588 |
| October 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Karen K Caldwell |
| P SO |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT: 1. Edwin Huntley's #1 complaint is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 2. This action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay.. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 11/5/2018.(JJ)cc: COR, Pro Se Plaintiff via US Mail |
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Huntley's #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED and payment is WAIVED. 2. Huntley's #1 complaint is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 3. This action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 4. A corresponding Judgment will be entered this date. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 11/5/2018.(JJ)cc: COR, Pro Se Plaintiff via US Mail
|
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edwin Huntley (STC) |
| Filing 5 STANDING ORDER re: Disclosure of Contact Information: 1. pro se litigants must provide current telephone number, residential address, & if different, mailing address. 2. pro se litigants must provide written notice of change of residential address, & if different, mailing address. 3. Clerk file copy of Order in all non-prisoner pro se actions. Failure to provide required information or change of address may result in appropriate sanctions. (JLM)cc: pro se plaintiff via U.S. Mail Modified on 10/26/2018 to edit text (JLM). |
| Filing 4 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(JLM) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edwin Huntley. Motions referred to P SO. (JLM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED), filed by Edwin Huntley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JLM) |
| Conflict Check run. (JLM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Huntley v. Lucas County Division of Child Support Services, Lucas County Ohio | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lucas County Division of Child Support Services, Lucas County Ohio | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edwin Huntley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
