Burchett v. Grand Lodge of Kentucky
Plaintiff: Caleb Nathaniel Burchett
Defendant: Grand Lodge of Kentucky
Case Number: 5:2019cv00356
Filed: September 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: P SO
Referring Judge: Gregory F VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2019 Filing 8 CONVENTIONAL FILING received on behalf of Caleb Nathaniel Burchett. Thumb Drive containing pictures and video filed re #1 Complaint (MAINTAINED ON THE SHELF IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE) (JJ)
September 17, 2019 Filing 7 JUDGMENT: (1) Burchett's claims are DISMISSED; (2) action is STRICKEN from the docket; (3) this is a final & appealable judgment. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 9/17/19.(KJR)cc: COR Burchett (US Mail)
September 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: (1) GRANTING pla's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis & payment of the filing & admn fees are WAIVED; (2) Burchett's claims are DISMISSED & STRICKEN from the docket; (3) judgment shall be entered. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 9/17/19. (KJR)cc: COR, Burchett (US Mail)
September 10, 2019 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Caleb Nathaniel Burchett (JJ)
September 10, 2019 Conflict Check run. (JJ)
September 9, 2019 Filing 5 STANDING ORDER re: Disclosure of Contact Information: 1. pro se litigants must provide current telephone number, residential address, & if different, mailing address. 2. pro se litigants must provide written notice of change of residential address, & if different, mailing address. 3. Clerk file copy of Order in all non-prisoner pro se actions. Failure to provide required information or change of address may result in appropriate sanctions. (JJ)cc: COR, Pltf via US Mail
September 9, 2019 Filing 4 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(JJ)
September 9, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Caleb Nathaniel Burchett, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (JJ)
September 9, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Caleb Nathaniel Burchett, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Grand Lodge of Kentucky)(JJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burchett v. Grand Lodge of Kentucky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Grand Lodge of Kentucky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Caleb Nathaniel Burchett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?