In re Attorney admission for Christopher M. Barber
| Attorney Admission Application |
| 5:2020aa00120 |
| October 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Danny C Reeves |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Certificate of Attorney Admission(cc: COR w/letter and packet)(SKV) |
Filing 3
ATTORNEY ADMISSION ORDER . Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 10/27/2020. (cc: COR)(TDA)
|
| Attorney Admission Order Submitted to Judge Danny C. Reeves(TDA) |
| Filing 2 KY Bar Check Completed(LFV) |
| Filing 1 Application for Attorney Admission from Christopher M. Barber (Attachments: #1 Authorization and Release, #2 Affidavit of Sponsor Richard Jacob Dieffenbach, #3 Receipt)(MDC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In re Attorney admission for Christopher M. Barber | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| In re: Attorney Admission Application | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
