Rutherford v. SSA
| Rebekah Leeann Rutherford |
| Commissioner of SSA |
| 5:2020cv00041 |
| February 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rebekah Leeann Rutherford via USM to Commissioner of SSA served on 2/18/2020. Service to U.S. Attorney executed via USM on 2/12/2020; Service to U.S. Attorney General executed via USM on 2/18/2020. (SLH) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Commissioner of SSA. (Morgan, Cheryl) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of SSA, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Summons issued and service packet delivered to U.S. Marshal for service. (KM) |
Filing 6
ORDER: 1. The Plaintiff's #4 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED; 2. Melissa A. Palmer is ADMITTED pro hac vice as counsel for Plaintiff Rebekah Leeann Rutherford. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 2/7/2020. (KM)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: It is ORDERED that the Plaintiff's #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 2/7/2020. (KM)cc: COR
|
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove for review: re #4 MOTION for Melissa A. Palmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Rebekah Leeann Rutherford ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4587236) (SLH) |
| BAR STATUS Check completed re #4 MOTION for Melissa A. Palmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Rebekah Leeann Rutherford ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4587236). (SLH) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Melissa A. Palmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Rebekah Leeann Rutherford ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4587236) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Palmer, Melissa) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rebekah Leeann Rutherford (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(SLH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Rebekah Leeann Rutherford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Notice of Appeal Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons USA EDKY, #4 Summons Commissioner of Social Security, #5 Summons USAG, #6 USM 285- USA EDKY, #7 USM 285- Comm. SSA, #8 USM 285- USAG)(SLH) |
| Conflict Check run. (SLH) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rebekah Leeann Rutherford (SLH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rutherford v. SSA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of SSA | |
| Represented By: | Cheryl D. Morgan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rebekah Leeann Rutherford | |
| Represented By: | Melissa Palmer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
