Freedman v. The Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
Plaintiff: Wendell Keith Clay, Jr. and Jacob Israel Freedman
Defendant: The Commonwealth of Kentucky and The State of Maryland
Case Number: 5:2022cv00212
Filed: August 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: P SO
Referring Judge: Gregory F VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2022 Filing 5 JUDGMENT: 1. The Complaint filed by Wendell Clay, Jr. is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. This matter is STRICKEN from the docket. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 8/19/22.(JLM)cc: COR and Clay by US Mail
August 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER of Dismissal: 1. The Complaint filed by Wendell Clay, Jr. is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. The Clerk shall SEND Clay the following forms in blank: a. a form Civil Rights Complaint [EDKY Form 520]; b. an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [AO Form 240]; and c. a Certificate of Inmate Account Form [EDKY Form 523]. 3. This matter is STRICKEN from the docket. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 8/19/22.(JLM)cc: COR and Clay (w/forms) by US Mail
August 17, 2022 Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample caption)(SAM)
August 17, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED)., filed by Jacob Israel Freedman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Citation, #2 Exhibit Application for Requisition, #3 Exhibit Affidavit of Identifying Witness, #4 Exhibit Letter 07/19/2022, #5 Exhibit Law Enforcement Profile, #6 Envelope postmarked 08/15/2022)(SAM)
August 17, 2022 Conflict Check run. (SAM)
August 17, 2022 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Complaint. (SAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Freedman v. The Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wendell Keith Clay, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacob Israel Freedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Commonwealth of Kentucky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The State of Maryland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?