Fugmann v. Kinnaman
Plaintiff: Chris Fugmann
Defendant: Wade Kinnaman
Case Number: 5:2022cv00287
Filed: October 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Karen K Caldwell
Referring Judge: Matthew A Stinnett
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2022 NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION TO Jeffrey T. Sampson re #10 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Chris Fugmann: Error: the disclosures #10 were incorrectly filed using the event motion for disclosure. Entry by attorney. Clerk modified the docket text of #10 to state, incorrectly filed. Clerk re-filed the Disclosures as #11 . In the future, contact the ECF help desk when assistance is needed to select the correct event. No further action required bycounsel. (MDC) cc: COR
December 14, 2022 Filing 11 FRCP 26(a) INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Chris Fugmann. Filed pursuant to QC re #10 .(MDC)
December 14, 2022 Filing 10 INCORRECTLY FILED AS MOTION. INITIAL MOTION for Disclosure by Chris Fugmann (Sampson, Jeffrey) Modified text/Terminated Motion on 12/15/2022 (MDC). Please see docket entry #11 for the CORRECT ENTRY for this document.
December 12, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of service by Wade Kinnaman Initial Disclosures (House, Jillian) Modified text on 12/13/2022 (MDC).
December 12, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of service by Wade Kinnaman First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents (House, Jillian) Modified text on 12/13/2022 (MDC).
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: 1) Parties exchange information NLT 10 days. 2) The parties shall assess the potential for agreed resolution of the case. 3) Motions to Amend Pleadings/Join Additional Parties due by 5/1/2023. 4) Fact Discovery: 11/1/2023. 5) Disclosure of Identity of Expert Witness: Pla, 10/1/2023; Dft, 11/11/2023. 6) Expert Discovery: 12/30/2023. 7) Discovery disputes shall be resolved in the manner described in this Order. 8) TELEPHONE MID-DISCOVERY CONFERENCE set for 9/13/2023 at 10:00 AM in LEXINGTON before Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett. The call will be OFF THE RECORD and for counsel only. To participate in the call, counsel must call 877.336.1828. Parties should contact Chambers for the undersigned at least 48 hours prior to the conference call to obtain the access code. 9) Dispositive/Daubert Motions: 01/15/2024. 10) Motion practice shall be governed by Local Rule 7.1 except as otherwise provided in this order. 11) Pretrial Filings due by 4/15/2024. 12) Motions in limine: 5/15/2024. 13) No extensions of the deadlines in this order shall be granted until an appropriate motion is filed prior to the expiration of the deadline in question, and upon a showing of good cause and exercise of counsel's due diligence. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE set for 6/28/2024 at 09:00 AM in LEXINGTON before Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett. JURY TRIAL set for 7/15/2024 at 09:00 AM in LEXINGTON before Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett. Counsel to be present at 8:30 a.m. (5 days). Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett on 12/02/2022. (MDC) cc: COR, D, JC Modified text on 12/2/2022 (MDC).
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE: Pursuant to the joint report filed by the parties, this matter is REASSIGNED to the Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett, for all purposes including entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 11/28/2022. (MDC) cc: COR
November 22, 2022 Filing 4 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (House, Jillian) Modified Filers on 11/22/2022 (MDC).
November 22, 2022 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Karen K. Caldwell for review: #4 Joint Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (MDC)
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: 1. W/in 21 days, parties meet; 2. NLT 14 days after meeting, file report. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 11/01/22.(JLM)cc: COR
October 28, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Madison Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-00327. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5399803), filed by Wade Kinnaman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- State Court Record Complaint, #2 Exhibit B- State Court Record Answer, #3 Exhibit C- State Court Record Notice)(SAM) Modified file date on 10/31/2022 (SAM).
October 28, 2022 Conflict Check run. (SAM)
October 28, 2022 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Karen K. Caldwell for review: #1 Notice of Removal, Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal) (SAM)
October 28, 2022 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Wade Kinnaman. FILED IN STATE COURT RECORD. SEE #1 (SAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fugmann v. Kinnaman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chris Fugmann
Represented By: Jeffrey T. Sampson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wade Kinnaman
Represented By: Jillian Dove House
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?