Schoenbaechler v. GHSW Enterprises, LLC et al
Joseph T Schoenbaechler |
GHSW Enterprises, LLC doing business as Strong Auto and University of Kentucky Federal Credit Union |
Joseph T Schoenbaechler |
University of Kentucky Federal Credit Union |
GHSW Enterprises, LLC |
GHSW Enterprises, LLC |
5:2024cv00159 |
June 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Danny C Reeves |
Truth in Lending |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by GHSW Enterprises, LLC. (Barnes, David) |
Filing 12 NOTICE by GHSW Enterprises, LLC of Withdrawal of Counsel (Ransdell, W.) |
Filing 11 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by University of Kentucky Federal Credit Union. (Allen, William) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Matthew Londergan. #8 Answer to Crossclaim, #7 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim has been filed by GHSW Enterprises, LLC without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (STC) |
Filing 9 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: 1. w/in 30 days, counsel conduct Rule 26(f) meeting; 2. at time of meeting; counsel exchange Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures; 3. w/in 14 days of meeting, counsel file written joint report outlining proposed discovery plan. Consent forms attached. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 7/30/2024. (Attachments: #1 AO 85)(STC)cc: COR |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY TO Matthew Londergan and David Barnes re #8 Answer to Crossclaim, #7 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim. Error: Signature on document (David Barnes) and filer (Matthew Londergan) do not match; Entry by attorney; the name of the Filing User under whose login and password the document is filed must be typed in the space where the signature would otherwise appear. No further action required by counsel. cc: COR (STC) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #6 Answer to Complaint, Crossclaim by GHSW Enterprises, LLC.(Londergan, Matthew) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, , COUNTERCLAIM against Joseph T Schoenbaechler by GHSW Enterprises, LLC.(Londergan, Matthew) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand , CROSSCLAIM against GHSW Enterprises, LLC by University of Kentucky Federal Credit Union.(Allen, William) |
Filing 5 ORDER:1. The proposed agreed order, filed as a motion #4 is GRANTED; 2. Dft GHSW Enterprises, LLC, doing business as Strong Auto, has through 7/29/24 to file a responsive pleading in this matter. No additional extensions will be granted for this purpose absent a showing of good cause. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 7/3/2024.(KCF)cc: COR |
Filing 4 Proposed Agreed Order Extending Time to File Responsive Pleading by GHSW Enterprises, LLC. (Ransdell, W.) Modified on 7/3/2024 (KCF). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to GHSW Enterprises, LLC, University of Kentucky Federal Credit Union and returned to counsel electronically for service. (Attachments: #1 Summons UKFCU)(KCF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $405; receipt number AKYEDC-5857847), filed by Joseph T Schoenbaechler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Retail Installment Sales Contract, #2 Exhibit Sales Agreement, #3 Exhibit Brandenburg Auto Report, #4 Summons Strong Auto, #5 Summons UKFCU, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(KCF) |
Conflict Check run. (KCF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.