GS Holistic, L.L.C v. Diamond Smoke LLC et al
| GS Holistic, L.L.C |
| Abdelrahman Mohammed, Diamond Smoke LLC doing business as Puff N Go Versailles and Puff-N-Buzz Smoke Shop LLC doing business as Puff N Go Smoke Shop |
| 5:2024cv00344 |
| November 21, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Danny C Reeves |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Returned Executed by Diamond Smoke LLC as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Smith, Zachary) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Diamond Smoke LLC, Abdelrahman Mohammed, Puff-N-Buzz Smoke Shop LLC and returned to counsel electronically for service. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(KMP) |
| Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding re #1 Complaint, cc: form e-mailed to Register. (KMP) |
| Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by GS Holistic, L.L.C. (KMP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $405; receipt number AKYEDC-5976761), filed by GS Holistic, L.L.C. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Trademark, #2 Exhibit B-Photos of Puff N Go Versailles and Puff N Go Smoke Shop, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons Proposed Summonses)(KMP) |
| Conflict Check run. (KMP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
