Bennett v. Bureau of Prisons et al
| Dawn Bennett |
| David Paul, Warden, William W. Lathop and Colette Peters |
| 5:2025cv00083 |
| March 19, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Karen K Caldwell |
| P SO |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(ADH) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 0.), filed by Dawn Bennett, Pro se. (Attachments: #1 Written 2241, #2 Pt. 2 2241, #3 Appointment for Counsel, #4 Appointment for Counsel, #5 Withdrawal from Account, #6 Letter, #7 Attachment Sent Certified Mail, #8 Envelope Postmarked March 13, 2025)(ADH) |
| Conflict Check run. (ADH) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #3 Pro Se Information Packet,, (ADH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
