Doolin v. Hinkle Contracting Corporation

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Kentucky Eastern District Doolin v. Hinkle Contracting Corporation

Doolin v. Hinkle Contracting Corporation

Plaintiff:	Rebecca Doolin
Defendant:	Hinkle Contracting Corporation
Case Number:	6:2009cv00425
Filed:	December 28, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office:	London Office
County:	Pulaski
Presiding Judge:	Gregory F. VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 25, 2012	Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Summary judgment for Hinkle, w/ respect to Doolin's FMLA claim and breach of contract claim, is appropriate and its motion 25 is hereby GRANTED with respect to those claims; 2. Doolins FMLA claim and breach o f contract claim are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. Summary judgment for Hinkle, with respect to Doolins Title VII and state law pregnancy discrimination claims, is inappropriate and its motion 25 is DENIED with respect to those claims; 4. Hinkles motion to strike a prior filing and substitute a new supplemental filing 38 , is GRANTED; and 5. Doolins motion to file a surreply 39 is GRANTED.. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 7/25/2012.(JMB)cc: COR

Date Filed

Document Text

July 25, 2012

Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Summary judgment for Hinkle, w/ respect to Doolin's FMLA claim and breach of contract claim, is appropriate and its motion 25 is hereby GRANTED with respect to those claims; 2. Doolins FMLA claim and breach o f contract claim are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. Summary judgment for Hinkle, with respect to Doolins Title VII and state law pregnancy discrimination claims, is inappropriate and its motion 25 is DENIED with respect to those claims; 4. Hinkles motion to strike a prior filing and substitute a new supplemental filing 38 , is GRANTED; and 5. Doolins motion to file a surreply 39 is GRANTED.. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 7/25/2012.(JMB)cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doolin v. Hinkle Contracting Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Doolin
Represented By:	Nicholas C.A. Vaughn
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Hinkle Contracting Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?