Bailey v. SSA
Plaintiff: Harvey L. Bailey
Defendant: SSA
Case Number: 6:2010cv00227
Filed: August 10, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: Bell
Presiding Judge: Jennifer B Coffman
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: The ALJ having properly applied the relevant legal standards and his decision being supported by substantial evidence,IT IS ORDERED that Bailey's motion (R. 11 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioners motion (R. 14 ) is GRANTED. The court will enter a separate judgment. Signed by Judge Jennifer B Coffman on 8/31/2011.(RBB)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bailey v. SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harvey L. Bailey
Represented By: Julie A. Atkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?