Kentucky Petroleum Operating LTD v. Golden et al
| Kentucky Petroleum Operating LTD |
| Max L. Golden, Andrew Neil Golden, Macar Investments, LLC and 7921 Energy, LLC |
| 6:2012cv00164 |
| August 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| Laurel |
| Amul R. Thapar |
| Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
276
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: It is ORDERED that: (1) The KPO entities' motion to alter or amend judgment, R. 235 , is DENIED. (2) The KPO entities' motion to quash, R. 238 , is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 05/07/2015.(KJA)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
142
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Macar and 7921's motion for summary judgment, R. 115 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 3/4/2015.(RC)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
98
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 1) Macar and 7921's motion for contempt sanctions, R. 63 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; 2) On September 5, 2014, at 11:30 a.m., the Court will hold a hearing at the U.S. Courthouse in London, Kentucky, to d etermine whether to issue civil contempt sanctions against the KPO defendants. Parties are responsible to have any necessary witnesses at the courthouse and ready to testify nlt 11:15 a.m.; 3) The KPO defendants' Motion to Quash the Writ of Garnishment, R. 75 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 8/19/2014.(RC)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) KPO's motion to quash R. 65 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 2) If KPO wishes to renew its motion to quash it must do so by Friday, June 13, 2014; 3) If KPO elects not to renew its motion the Court will order any property or proceeds of any debt belonging to KPO in Sunoco's possession applied upon the judgment pur Ky.Rev.Stat § 425.501(5); 4) By Friday, June 13, 2014, the KPO Entities must also file a sur-reply that addresses the le gal arguments made by 7921 and Macar in their reply brief in support of their motion for sanctions; 5) In the future, the Court will deny w/o prejudice any motion filed without adequate, on-point citations to precedent or other legal authority. Sur Reply due by 6/13/2014.) Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 5/30/2014.(RC)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 1) The defendants' motion for summary judgment, R. 28, R. 34, is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 1/21/2014.(RC)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
